I’ve always liked the play Art, by Yesmina Reza, and hope to someday be able to play Yvan,
Marc, or Serge. Maybe I like the play
because it really explores the concept of “best friend” dynamics. It is a play about friendship and questions
how one behaves when someone close does something unexpected or immature to our
specific values. This dark comedy is
centered on three best friends who debate whether an expensive painting is
really a piece of art. I’m not sure if
this concept has been done before, but I would really love to play out this
piece in the middle of an art gallery…perhaps at an opening event. The whole space would be used as the “stage”
for Marc, Yvan, and Serge to debate and fight about the white painting that is
considered to be a true work of art. Or
perhaps they can use an obscure piece of art from an installation and have the
audience question with them whether it is truly art or not. Usually, the play
is set in the apartments of the three friends, but I would want to place the
action in the art gallery. Each
character has asides to the audience in the play, and I would want these
characters to grab the attention of specific spectators in the gallery and
really talk to them—recruiting them, on their side if possible, as part of the
debate. I would want it to be a piece
that’s duration is flexible with what actually happens in the gallery; there
would be multi and local focus moments during the event. Spectators would see characters interact in
the scenes, but then separate into different areas of the galleries after a
heated argument. Spectators could choose
who they want to follow and interact with them until another scene ensues when
the characters run into each other again.
This could be the type of
performance where a spectator needs to see the event three different times to
follow the journey of each character throughout the evening. Not only will it be a play about friendship
dynamics and what art truly is, it will become a piece about what performance
is considered. Spectators will
intermittently wonder whether this is a performance or a real event taking
place in the art gallery. There will be
periods of intense action but also periods of stillness and reflection. The script of the play will be used, but also
whatever improvisation naturally happens with the spectators present. It will
be a “night-filling” play! Here's a scene from the play with women in the roles:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2c6Op9q7sas
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2c6Op9q7sas
This type of experience would force the spectator to side
with a particular character; whereas a normal staging of the play allows the audience
to understand each character’s point of view and eventually determine which point
of view they identify with. I think this
approach will enhance the piece into a more visceral experience for the
audience. It becomes a different experience than the already compelling
experience a normal staging of the play produces. The themes of the play are put into action
with the spectators. They will find themselves agreeing or disagreeing, as well
as reacting or not reacting to the performance.
How involved will the audience become?
How far will they allow the characters to interact the way that they
do? How will they interact with other
spectators? What points really unnerve
them into action? The experience turns a
public, sacred space into more of a public, private space.
I agree with Kantor’s thoughts, however, there is still
merit to traditional theatrical productions.
In some aspects, found environmental spaces remind me somewhat of
naturalistic elements. As artists, we
are expected to think outside of the box.
When a concept or production really pushes the boundaries, meanings, and
concepts--and it works--it changes the experience of the audience as well as
the performer. We want to give a new
experience and change the audience somehow in the arts. We want to inspire but can only do so with
inspiring work. There is nothing more exciting than experiencing something new
or unexpected because it produces something new and unexpected in myself. The theatre is a social medium that can
affect us in such a meaningful way, both the performer and the audience.
Very cool idea Joe of placing this show in an Art Gallery. I totally love the idea of the three best friends debating on an art piece and the audience seeing the piece right before their eyes while also being surrounded by other works of art. Your idea of breaking the fourth wall and allowing the spectators to interact with the actors is cool as well. It allows the spectators to truly go on the journey with the three best friends and at the end of the play they can formulate their own opinion on who side they'll take. I also like the idea of you allowing the actors to improv if they so choose. That would cause the show to truly be different from night to night compared to sticking straight to the script. You mentioned that found environmental spaces remind you of naturalistic elements, and in this sense coincides with Kantor's quote. However, environmental spaces aren't the same spaces found in traditional theatre spaces. So what about traditional theatre do you feel has become sterilized or neutralized?
ReplyDelete-Amar